Audiophile Series: E3 - DSD vs PCM



DSD Records (DSD) is a trademark used by Sony and Philips for their system of digitally recreating audible signals for the Super Audio CD (SACD). It has sampling rate from 2.8 to 5.6 MHz (64 times more than CD quality 44.1 kHz) and bit depth is only 1 bit.

How ridiculous! From episode 1 we know, as our listening range is 20-20000 Hz, so according to Nyquist frequency theory, 44.1KHz is fair enough not to miss anything, then why we need to push sampling rate to Mega Hz range? And why bit depth is only one bit where people are now craving for 24 bits instead of 16? Well, cause its totally different from PCM algorithm.

First of all, you need to know about PCM algorithm. If you aren’t familiar with it, check my article Audiophile Series: Episode 2.

DSD (Direct Stream Digital) takes a different approach. DSD seemed an ideal system to build the new format around, particularly as it has a great copy protection. The main attraction of DSD is its simplicity and, with that, cheapness of implementation. It needs less processing than PCM and can use simpler, far less expensive DACs.

DSD Algorithm:
DSD uses a single bit of information, and all this information tells us is whether the current sample of the analogue waveform is higher or lower than in the previous one. Compared with the over 65,000 different values 16-bit PCM has, the two values (0 if the new sample if the signal is lower or 1 if it’s higher) of DSD appear mighty limiting.

That resolution shortfall is made up by the very high sampling rate of over 2.8 million times a second – that’s 64 times the speed of CD. Standard DSD is sometimes called DSD64 for this reason, with double and quadruple speed versions called DSD128 and DSD256 respectively. There's even a DSD512 spec, though none ever heard any material encoded in it.
Standard DSD recordings are still relatively rare compared with the PCM alternatives, and these higher speed versions are extremely limited to hardcore enthusiasts. DSD fans claim the format is as close to analogue as digital gets.

Downsides
It’s not very practical to manipulate a DSD recording. All the things that are required post-recording usually involve the DSD stream being converted to PCM to do the processing and then switched back.
Just about every studio recording made with DSD goes through this process. The processed PCM is called DXD (the name seems like DSD but it’s actually 24 bit 352 kHz PCM).
When it comes to measurement, DSD also has issues with high levels of noise compared with PCM. Clever processing techniques allow the engineers to shift the noise above our hearing, and optimise the performance in the audible region. The high-frequency noise is generally filtered out.
DSD vs PCM
There’s no exact way of striking equivalence between PCM and DSD but it’s around the same as 24-bit/88.2kHz PCM. In terms of dynamic range, DSD is claimed to be around 120dB in the audible frequency range. In comparison, CD measures around 96dB, and 24-bit/192kHz recordings have a theoretical maximum of around 144dB.
Compatibility
There are two kinds of DSD files, DSDIFF and DSF, but you should always choose the DSF version if your player is compatible – it’s better at holding a track's metadata information (artist/song name, album art etc).

Reference:

Popular Posts